Breaking

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

Samsung Galaxy S7 vs iPhone 6s Speed Test! #Helpful Post


Samsung Galaxy S7 vs iPhone 6s Speed Test! #Helpful Post

Hey guys, this is Austin.
Is the new Samsung Galaxy S7 the fastest phone out there?
To find out, let's pit it against the current fastest
phone out there, the iPhone 6s Plus.
Even though these are two high-end
phones with 5.5 inch screens,
they actually have a lot of differences.
The Galaxy S7 is rocking some serious specs
with a quad-core Snapdragon 820 processor,
four gigabytes of RAM,
and Adreno 530 graphics.
On the other hand,

the iPhone is no slouch either.
With a dual-core Apple A9 chip,
2 gigabytes of RAM,
and PowerVR graphics.
Specs are great on paper,
but the real question is how do they actually perform?
To find out, let's turn to the Geekbench 3 test
which primarily focuses on the CPU side.
Geekbench does a good job of testing real world performance.
A phone that does well here is going to be
noticeably faster during normal day-to-day tasks
such as web browsing and installing apps.
Considering that the Galaxy S7 has twice as many
cores as the iPhone, it gets a small but substantial
lead in the multi threaded side.
However, for the single threaded performance,
the iPhone is still king.
Even though it's fairly close,
the Galaxy S7 pulled out a small but noticeable win here.
Next we've got GFXBench,
which is all about testing the graphics performance.
So this is important for making sure the phone
is nice and smooth
as well as how it can handle gaming.
One of the big differences between the
iPhone and the Galaxy S7 are the screens.
While the iPhone has a fairly standard 1080p screen,
the Galaxy S7 has a much more pixel dense 1440p panel,
which means that the processor inside has to do
a lot more work to keep things running smoothly.
You can see the difference here when you're
running the Manhattan on screen test.
The iPhone is able to pull 38 frames per second,
where the Galaxy S7 is only able to pull out 29.
However, if you take the screens out of the equation
and just want to see which one has the most raw power,
you'll find that the Galaxy S7 wins out here
with 47 frames per second versus only
40 on the iPhone.
Don't get me wrong,
these are absolutely two of the fastest phones
out there right now.
However, as far as raw performance goes
the Galaxy S7 also pulls out the win here.
One feature that's becoming more and more
important these days is a fingerprint reader.
Both the iPhone and Galaxy S7 have them.
However, I wanted to find out which one is actually faster.
At first glance, both phones are incredibly fast.
Scanning your fingerprint and unlocking the phone
just about as fast as you can press the button.
However, if you watch it back in slow motion,
you'll see the Galaxy S7 is a bit faster.
Mostly because it gets you immediately to the home screen
where the iPhone spends a second giving you a
big animation in bringing all your icons on screen.
It looks cool, but it wastes time.
The Galaxy S7 is just faster here.
When it comes to a tap to focus,
both are really solid.
So if I had to pick a winner,
I would narrowly give it to the Galaxy S7.
While both are solid, the S7 seems to just be
a little bit quicker and just a little bit more
accurate than the iPhone.
Since both phones can capture 4K video,
my next test was to capture 30 seconds on each phone
and then export it to see how long it takes.
Here, the iPhone has a major advantage thanks to iMovie.
Now not only is this a fairly solid video editor,
but it also is much faster at exporting video
than the Galaxy S7.
There's no doubt that the iPhone 6s is one of
the fastest phones out there,
but the Galaxy S7 edges it out.
Yeah, I did that.
That just happened.
I'm really proud of myself right now.
If you guys want to see how the Galaxy S7
fares in a water test and
want a chance to win a brand new one,
check out the link in the description.
My buddy Jon and I are going to be
giving away a brand new S7 or S7 Edge.
Anyway guys, what do you think about the S7?
Let me know in the comments below
and I will catch you in the next one.


No comments: